Leaders in Minneapolis and other cities across the country looking for answers to homelessness will be watching the nation’s highest court on Monday.

Justices on the United States Supreme Court will hear arguments about homeless encampments, and whether actions against them violate the country’s constitution.

The case has sweeping implications for those living on the streets, both locally and across the United States.

Justices will be hearing arguments whether a ban on encampments is “cruel and unusual”, and is out of Grants Pass, Oregon.

About 10 years ago, the city tried banning anyone “from using a blanket, pillow or cardboard box for protection” while sleeping outside.

There are no public homeless shelters in Grants Pass.

RELATED: Can homeless people be fined for sleeping outside? A rural Oregon city asks the US Supreme Court

An attorney representing homeless residents there says punishing those who don’t have anywhere to go will make matters worse.

In recent months, the city of Minneapolis has had to clear an encampment a handful of times, citing health and safety issues.

RELATED: Minneapolis clears homeless encampment in Phillips West neighborhood

On Sunday morning, an area homeless organization posted a message on social media, saying “arrests and fines don’t solve homelessness – they extend it.”

Some local homeless advocates believe permanent housing is key.

“I think anything that helps provide increased levels of safety, predictability and dignity is a step int he right directions,” says John Tribbett of Avivo.

The Supreme Court is expected to lay out guidelines for how cities can regulate homeless encampments going forward, and their decision is expected by the end of June.

RELATED: Record numbers in the US are homeless. Can cities fine them for sleeping in parks and on sidewalks?