The Justice Department sued Texas on Monday over its new redistricting maps, saying the plans discriminate against minority voters, particularly Latinos, who have fueled the state’s population boom.

The lawsuit claims the Republican-controlled state violated part of the Voting Rights Act in drawing new district boundaries for its congressional delegation and state legislature. It’s the Biden Justice Department’s first legal action challenging a state’s maps since states began redrawing their maps this year to account for population changes.

The lawsuit notes that most of Texas’ population growth over the past decade came from Black, Latino and Asian people, but alleges that the new maps drawn by state Republicans dilute these communities’ votes by denying them opportunities to choose their representatives. It says the maps pack Black and especially Latino communities into bizarre-shaped districts — a Dallas-area one is described as "seahorse" shaped — while preserving seats for white Republicans.

"This is not the first time that Texas has acted to minimize the voting rights of its minority citizens," Associate Attorney General Vanita Gupta said during a news conference with Attorney General Merrick Garland. "Decade after decade, courts have found that Texas has enacted redistricting plans that deliberately dilute the voting strength of Latino and Black voters and that violate the Voting Rights Act."

The litigation comes as Republicans and Democrats jockey for an edge in the once-a-decade redistricting process, which has already reached new levels of gerrymandering. The lawsuit also plays out during a changed legal landscape for redistricting challenges. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2019 that it won’t referee partisan gerrymandering disputes — maps drawn to benefit a political party.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Republican, condemned the litigation as an intrusion by the Democratic administration. "The Department of Justice’s absurd lawsuit against our state is the Biden Administration’s latest ploy to control Texas voters," Paton tweeted. "I am confident that our legislature’s redistricting decisions will be proven lawful, and this preposterous attempt to sway democracy will fail."

Monday’s lawsuit, filed in the Western District of Texas, cites several congressional districts in which Republicans drew tortured lines to lower the share of Black and Latino voters in their party’s congressional districts.

In west Texas’ competitive 23rd District, the map trimmed out areas near El Paso and San Antonio to lower the share of Latino voting-age residents by 9%. In the Dallas area, it pulled Black and Latino residents in the northwest suburbs out of the district of Republican Rep. Beth Van Duyne, who narrowly won her reelection bid against Candace Valenzuela, a Democratic Black Latina candidate last year. In the Houston area, where the share of the white population is dwindling, the map kept six of 10 House districts as white-majority or plurality districts.

Texas has had to defend its maps in court after every redistricting process since the Voting Rights Act took effect in 1965, but this will be the first since a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court ruling gutted a provision of the Voting Rights Act that had required Texas and other states with a history of racial discrimination to have the Justice Department approve the maps.

The case is the second civil rights lawsuit the Biden administration has filed against Texas recently. Last month it sued to overturn the state’s new voting law, claiming a bevy of new restrictions passed by the legislature would disenfranchise citizens in the state.

It remains illegal for mapmakers to discriminate on the basis of race while drawing legislative lines. Additionally, Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act prohibits line-drawers from diluting the voting power of minorities by scattering them among districts and preventing them from choosing their preferred candidates.

That’s what the lawsuit alleges Texas Republicans did.

"The Legislature refused to recognize the State’s growing minority electorate," the lawsuit alleges. "Although the Texas Congressional delegation expanded from 36 to 38 seats, Texas designed the two new seats to have Anglo voting majorities."

The lawsuit notes that Texas’ congressional map was drawn with heavy input from its Republican congressional delegation, which is white except for one Latino representative. Statehouse Democrats at the time objected strongly to the process and the results.

Although the federal lawsuit alleges African American voters are also treated improperly by the map, the bulk of the case centers around the map’s treatment of Latinos. Multiple Latino civil rights groups have also sued to challenge the map.

Texas’ GOP governor, Greg Abbott, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Former Rep. Beto O’Rourke, a Democrat who is challenging Abbott next year, tweeted: "Texas leaders would rather gerrymander election maps and handpick their own voters than earn their place in power by listening and responding to the needs of Texans."

The Justice Department sued Texas on Monday over its new redistricting maps, saying the plans discriminate against minority voters, particularly Latinos, who have fueled the state’s population boom.

The lawsuit claims the Republican-controlled state violated part of the Voting Rights Act in drawing new district boundaries for its congressional delegation and state legislature. It’s the Biden Justice Department’s first legal action challenging a state’s maps since states began redrawing their maps this year to account for population changes.

The lawsuit notes that most of Texas’ population growth over the past decade came from Black, Latino and Asian people, but alleges that the new maps drawn by state Republicans dilute these communities’ votes by denying them opportunities to choose their representatives. It says the maps pack Black and especially Latino communities into bizarre-shaped districts — a Dallas-area one is described as "seahorse" shaped — while preserving seats for white Republicans.

"This is not the first time that Texas has acted to minimize the voting rights of its minority citizens," Associate Attorney General Vanita Gupta said during a news conference with Attorney General Merrick Garland. "Decade after decade, courts have found that Texas has enacted redistricting plans that deliberately dilute the voting strength of Latino and Black voters and that violate the Voting Rights Act."

The litigation comes as Republicans and Democrats jockey for an edge in the once-a-decade redistricting process, which has already reached new levels of gerrymandering. The lawsuit also plays out during a changed legal landscape for redistricting challenges. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2019 that it won’t referee partisan gerrymandering disputes — maps drawn to benefit a political party.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Republican, condemned the litigation as an intrusion by the Democratic administration. "The Department of Justice’s absurd lawsuit against our state is the Biden Administration’s latest ploy to control Texas voters," Paton tweeted. "I am confident that our legislature’s redistricting decisions will be proven lawful, and this preposterous attempt to sway democracy will fail."

Monday’s lawsuit, filed in the Western District of Texas, cites several congressional districts in which Republicans drew tortured lines to lower the share of Black and Latino voters in their party’s congressional districts.

In west Texas’ competitive 23rd District, the map trimmed out areas near El Paso and San Antonio to lower the share of Latino voting-age residents by 9%. In the Dallas area, it pulled Black and Latino residents in the northwest suburbs out of the district of Republican Rep. Beth Van Duyne, who narrowly won her reelection bid against Candace Valenzuela, a Democratic Black Latina candidate last year. In the Houston area, where the share of the white population is dwindling, the map kept six of 10 House districts as white-majority or plurality districts.

Texas has had to defend its maps in court after every redistricting process since the Voting Rights Act took effect in 1965, but this will be the first since a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court ruling gutted a provision of the Voting Rights Act that had required Texas and other states with a history of racial discrimination to have the Justice Department approve the maps.

The case is the second civil rights lawsuit the Biden administration has filed against Texas recently. Last month it sued to overturn the state’s new voting law, claiming a bevy of new restrictions passed by the legislature would disenfranchise citizens in the state.

It remains illegal for mapmakers to discriminate on the basis of race while drawing legislative lines. Additionally, Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act prohibits line-drawers from diluting the voting power of minorities by scattering them among districts and preventing them from choosing their preferred candidates.

That’s what the lawsuit alleges Texas Republicans did.

"The Legislature refused to recognize the State’s growing minority electorate," the lawsuit alleges. "Although the Texas Congressional delegation expanded from 36 to 38 seats, Texas designed the two new seats to have Anglo voting majorities."

The lawsuit notes that Texas’ congressional map was drawn with heavy input from its Republican congressional delegation, which is white except for one Latino representative. Statehouse Democrats at the time objected strongly to the process and the results.

Although the federal lawsuit alleges African American voters are also treated improperly by the map, the bulk of the case centers around the map’s treatment of Latinos. Multiple Latino civil rights groups have also sued to challenge the map.

Texas’ GOP governor, Greg Abbott, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Former Rep. Beto O’Rourke, a Democrat who is challenging Abbott next year, tweeted: "Texas leaders would rather gerrymander election maps and handpick their own voters than earn their place in power by listening and responding to the needs of Texans."