The Minnesota Department of Transportation is working to determine the impact of the Trump Administration’s decision to suspend a plan to build electric vehicle charging stations across the country.

In a letter Thursday night, the Trump administration directed states to stop spending money for EV charging infrastructure, funds they were allocated under former President Joe Biden. Trump has slammed federal funding for electric vehicle chargers as “an incredible waste of taxpayer dollars.”

The administration may need an act of Congress for this, and it’s unclear there will be one. Industry leaders say customer demand will continue to drive growth in the charging network, regardless of federal funding.

The National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) Formula Program provides federal funds to states to create a reliable fast charging network for the public open 24 hours, seven days a week. Minnesota expected to receive $68 million from fiscal year 2022 to 2026.

The Minnesota Department of Transportation focused on the major I-94 and I-35 corridors as it selected 13 sites in the first round of grants announced last summer. The projects spanned from Moorhead to Albert Lea amounting to more than $7 million. The state expected to share a second round of awards in April. According to its most recent state infrastructure plan, MNDOT also wanted to include the I-90 corridor in future NEVI projects.

The Thursday memo said the Federal Highway Administration is “updating the NEVI formula program guidance” with a draft expected for public comment in the spring. Existing state plans are suspended and “no new obligations may occur under the NEVI Formula Program until the updated final NEVI Formula Program Guidance is issued and new State plans are submitted and approved.”

“Stopping a program that was clearly trying to do good things for everyone, it’s sad to see,” said Jukka Kukkonen, the founder of Shift 2 Electric, which is a Minnesota company focused on the electric vehicle market. “Even some of the biggest highways have little gaps and that’s where this would’ve helped, so even getting those covered and then stretching out of that to different places out state.”

The Minnesota Automobile Dealers Association President Scott Lambert told 5 EYEWITNESS NEWS the decision will also make it harder for dealers to sell electric vehicles. 

“It’s sort of exasperating,” said Lambert, of the NEVI pause. “We really don’t have a public infrastructure for electrical vehicle car charging in Minnesota.”

He said the availability of chargers, range anxiety, and concerns about charge during the winter has affected sales. Electric vehicles accounted for about 6% of sales in Minnesota in 2023, up from about 1% in 2018, according to MNDOT.

Lambert believes public charging infrastructure will need private investment.

“The NEVI project would’ve taken care of the major corridors in Minnesota,” he said. “It was going to be impactful and it is too bad. It’s definitely something for people to think about if they’re buying an electric vehicle.”

A MNDOT spokesperson said in a statement in response to the Trump Administration’s directive, “MnDOT is committed to continuing our work to deliver a high-quality transportation system that meets the needs of Minnesotans – including electric vehicle infrastructure across the state. EV charging infrastructure will help Minnesotans breath cleaner air and make progress on our greenhouse gas emission goals. We are aware of the Federal Highway Administration’s suspension of approval of state electric vehicle infrastructure deployment plans and are working to determine the impact of this direction on our projects and work. We will continue moving forward in our work to build EV infrastructure and will explore all available options to advance this important work.”

The Tesla Supercharger network — led by CEO Elon Musk, now a prominent member of Trump’s inner circle — itself has received millions of dollars through the program that was just halted. But it also has a massive footprint of chargers across the country. Tesla will continue expanding its network regardless of federal money — and likely still benefit from its competitors receiving fewer funds.

What is President Trump trying to do with EV charging?

On his first day in office Trump paused billions of dollars in funding for a nationwide buildout of fast electric car chargers that had been allocated to states through the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Formula program.

Then the Federal Highway Administration, an agency of the U.S. Department of Transportation that administers NEVI funding, told states Thursday to stop carrying out their plans pending new guidelines. It’s part of the broader effort to dismantle many environmental policies and incentives put in place by the Biden administration.

Some states, including Alabama and Rhode Island, already had suspended their programs with the Inauguration Day order, but Thursday’s directive is a further push from the Trump administration to halt federal efforts to electrify the roads and reduce planet-warming emissions from transportation.

States that currently have NEVI-funded projects up and running mostly have been reimbursed by the federal government. But the new memo means states with projects in the works, or those currently contracting for them, have to come to a screeching halt, and they don’t know if or when they will be able to proceed and request reimbursement.

Why does this effort matter for EV drivers in the U.S.?

NEVI was created through the Biden administration’s Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, passed by Congress in 2021, to fill gaps in the EV charging infrastructure network. For example, before, it might not have penciled out for a private company to install a charger along a rural highway with little traffic versus in a busy city, so this funding is an incentive to electrify those neglected regions.

NEVI also addresses the concern many car buyers have for road trips where charging stations are too far apart.

The NEVI program awards states $5 billion over five years, but they’ve struggled with permitting delays, complicated electrical upgrades and contracting.

Estimates suggest $3.3 billion of NEVI funding had already gone out the door to states.

Legal challenges for charging stations along highways

This announcement creates uncertainty, said Ryan Gallentine, managing director at business association Advanced Energy United.

“Most of the unawarded money is sitting in state Department of Transportation bank accounts ready to be spent,” Gallentine said in a statement. States are under no obligation to stop these projects based solely on this announcement, he said. “We call on state DOTs and program administrators to continue executing this program until new guidance is finalized.”

Others say the effort is sure to start legal battles.

“There’s no legal basis” for stopping plans that have already been approved and funded, said Andrew Wishnia, former deputy assistant secretary for climate policy at the DOT who helped author the NEVI program.

Regardless, Loren McDonald, chief analyst at Paren, a company that tracks EV charging data, emphasized EV range concerns will linger. “If you don’t have convenient access either where you live or where you work or in between, why would you get an EV? It just doesn’t make sense,” he said.

Money that was leftover after states met their highway obligations was meant to fill other gaps in charging: areas where there are low rates of EVs, including low-income areas or areas with a lot of apartment buildings where it hard for people to charge.

What’s next for U.S. highway EV charging?

The federal buildout is not the only or even the central effort to build EV charging across the nation. Private companies have collectively spent billions on this infrastructure.

Industry leaders say that the demand from drivers for EV chargers will propel companies to build more of them. “I think the trend will continue. Maybe it’ll slow down over the next four years … but it’s going to continue,” said Bassem Ammouri, the chief operating officer at EV Connect, a major EV charging platform.

The fear for some is that delaying critical charging infrastructure could have a domino effect on the EV transition, because it could slow sales, said Matt Stephens-Rich, director of programs at the non-partisan group Electrification Coalition.

“As the world is shifting to electric vehicles, any slowdown will put the U.S. auto industry further behind,” Stephens-Rich said.

___

Read more of AP’s climate coverage at http://www.apnews.com/climate-and-environment

___

The Associated Press’ climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.

Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.