Advertisement

Judge Won't Stop Oil from Flowing Through Disputed Pipeline

Dakota Access Pipeline protest site Photo: AP/File
Dakota Access Pipeline protest site

March 15, 2017 10:37 AM

A judge refused to head off the imminent flow of oil in the disputed Dakota Access pipeline, likely clearing the way for operations to begin next week.

U.S. District Judge James Boasberg denied a request by the Standing Rock and Cheyenne River Sioux tribes to stop oil from flowing while the tribes appeal his decision last week allowing pipeline construction to finish.

Advertisement – Content Continues Below

RELATED: Tribes Ask Judge to Stop Dakota Access Oil from Flowing

"The critical factor here is Cheyenne River's lack of likelihood of success on the merits ... plaintiff does not have a strong case on appeal," Boasberg said in his ruling Tuesday.

Cheyenne River attorney Nicole Ducheneaux did not immediately respond to a request for comment Wednesday.

RELATED: Opponents of Dakota Pipeline to Rally at White House

Texas-based pipeline developer Energy Transfer Partners is finishing up pipeline work beneath Lake Oahe, a Missouri River reservoir in North Dakota and the last piece of construction on the 1,200-mile, $3.8 billion pipeline to move North Dakota oil to a distribution point in Illinois. The tribes maintain an oil pipeline under the lake they consider sacred violates their religious rights, but Boasberg says the argument was made too late and is of questionable merit.

The judge also said ETP would be "substantially harmed" by a delay, as it prepares to move oil through the pipeline as early as Monday.

Both ETP and the Army Corps of Engineers had objected to the tribes' latest attempt to halt the project, with Corps attorneys saying in court documents that President Donald Trump "has expressly determined that the pipeline is 'in the national interest.'"

The Corps last month granted ETP permission to lay pipe under the reservoir that it manages for the federal government, after Trump in January urged the project's completion after months of legal delays.

The court battle isn't over. Aside from the tribes' appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on the religion argument, the tribes in their lawsuit before Boasberg are arguing for more environmental study and for the government to recognize the tribes' treaty rights to clean water.

(Copyright 2017 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

Credits

Theresa Malloy

Copyright 2017 - KSTP-TV, LLC A Hubbard Broadcasting Company

Advertisement

City Council Considers BYOB to a Minneapolis Park

New reward to find hit and run driver who killed Barbara Mahigel

Family of Hit-and-Run Victim Hopeful New Reward Will Lead to Arrest

Minnesota Plans to Update Emergency Alert System

Orlando Ramos

Candidate for Saint Paul Schools Superintendent Drops Out

Gov. Dayton Proposes $175 Million for Pre-K in Minnesota

Sour Grapes? Minnesota Wineries Sue State, Hoping to Overturn Law

Advertisement