ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) - Republican Norm Coleman on Friday gave Minnesota's Supreme Court a roadmap for counting more rejected absentee ballots in his disputed Senate race with Democrat Al Franken, asking justices to give voters the benefit of the doubt.
In Coleman's final brief with the court, his lawyers argue the court should apply state standards for counting absentee ballots with an eye toward accepting them as Election Day judges did, rather than the more rigid view used in the trial that followed a statewide recount.
Franken is 312 votes ahead. Coleman said he can take the lead if justices deem more ballots legitimate.
"Applying the standard used on election night to all remaining rejected absentee ballots does not mean the court would be turning a blind eye to the statutory requirements," the former senator's lawyers wrote. Instead, they said it would acknowledge that some election officials were looser in their application of state law.
Coleman wants as many as 4,400 more ballots added to the race. They are among a pool of nearly 12,000 absentee ballots turned away on or before Election Day.
Minnesota has four reasons for rejecting a ballot: the voter wasn't registered, they failed to sign the ballot, their witness wasn't qualified and they cast another ballot.
Coleman wants the court to presume that a voter who got an absentee ballot was registered, their witness was authorized and they put their genuine signature on it.
He has long contended that officials in some places took a harder reading of the law than others, meaning ballots ruled eligible in one county would be disqualified in another.
"In sum, the record confronts the court with indisputable evidence that this deliberate, disparate treatment of voters was significant enough to affect the outcome," Coleman's brief said.
Coleman's side said more outstanding ballots are from areas Coleman won than areas where Franken prevailed, although they haven't offered anything other than a geographical analysis.
There is no deadline for a ruling after the June 1 oral arguments.
Coleman could try to take his case to the U.S. Supreme Court if he loses this round.
A Franken win would give Democrats and aligned independents 60 votes in the Senate. That's the number needed to cut off unfettered debate known as filibusters.
In a brief Monday, Franken's attorneys said counties reasonably interpreted statewide standards on absentee ballots. They said any errors were minor.
Franken asked the high court to instruct Republican Gov. Tim Pawlenty to issue an election certificate, the gateway document needed to fill the vacant seat.
Coleman hasn't addressed the certificate issue in his filings. "The court will do what the court does and that's fine by us," Ginsberg said in a Friday conference call with reporters.
(Copyright 2009 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)
Related stories:
Coleman wants to use campaign cash in lawsuits
State's next Senator won't be known until at least June
Minnesota Senate race moves to high court appeal
Franken names Minn. state director
Minn. Senate case tests court that shuns politics
Vandals strike Coleman's St. Paul home
No letup in Senate cash chase
MUST WATCH: One-on-one with Coleman 
Radio ad aims at Coleman, but who else?
Coleman to appeal Senate ruling next week
JUDGES: Franken winner of Senate race
Should the Senate battle continue?
PAWLENTY: No Senate certificate until process complete
Franken's lead jumps to 312
Pile of Senate ballots that may count drops
389 absentee votes to be counted in Senate race Tuesday
COURT: 400 absentees may be added to Senate race
Senate race now state's tardiest election
Senate trial to go to judges Friday
Senate case closing arguments set for Friday
Voter signatures are quandary in Senate case
Costs mounting as Senate trial drags on
Court rejects Franken bid to be seated in Senate